Matthew Carroll, Tuesday, January 12th, 2010
First things first: "Green Oil Sands" is a total oxymoron.
Putting that aside for a second, Satya Das misses a very important point if he is serious about transitioning to a carbon-free economy in time to avoid catastrophic climate change. We already have more than enough conventional fossil fuel reserves globally (i.e. excluding unconventional sources such as the tar sands) that if we burn it all, we will greatly exceed two degrees of warming. We simply cannot afford to burn it all; even two degrees means devastation and massive loss of life for small island states and Africa.
Das' message is that we should go right ahead and burn the oil under Alberta... as long as we use the money publicly to invest in solutions. The truth is that any global plan that is serious about dealing with climate change will have to decide not only how to spend humanity's small remaining budget of carbon emissions in as equitable and efficient way possible to transition us to non-carbon energy sources (and a steady-state economy where improved quality of life globally is decoupled from resource extraction), but also which fossil fuel sources we're going to burn to get us there.
So, the question becomes not "how do we fund the transition by expanding the oil sands?" but rather "which existing, conventional reserves are we going to choose to leave in the ground?" It goes without question that as we drastically reduce our fossil fuel use in Canada - cutting our emissions in half in the next 10 years as the science demands - the dirtiest, most carbon-intensive sources of fuel such as the tar sands must be the first to be abandoned.
Read More1 comment
Tzeporah Berman, March 19, 2009
"You mean they want to ban all renewable energy companies from your province?"
This is the point when I sigh inwardly during conversations with colleagues from outside B.
Read More
Tzeporah Berman, March 5, 2009
I'm planning a series of posts on the state of play of "environmentalism" in Canada and to work through the thorny questions over what environmental "leadership" (icky term I know) means at this pivotal moment on Earth.
Read More
Chris Hatch, January 28, 2009
The Conservative government is talking “green stimulus” but, in a surprise move, did not renew support to green energy production in its budget.
Read More
The cumulative cost of the melting Arctic in the next 40 years is equivalent to the annual gross domestic products of Germany, Russia and the United Kingdom combined, according to the authors of the study prepared for the Pew Environment Group.
Chris Hatch, October 20, 2009
Some of the leading player in Canadian industry are calling on the federal government to set hard, declining caps on global warming emissions in a statement released today.
Read More
Tzeporah Berman, October 23, 2009
Ottawa Dashes Hopes for Climate Treaty in Copenhagen blares the front-page headline facing Canadians across the country today.
Read More